The double commission: what’s legal — and what isn’t

Charging owner and tenant at once: common on the coast, but the law draws a sharp line. The system explained, without pointing fingers.

Renting & Regulation

The double commission: what’s legal — and what isn’t.

This isn’t about distrusting everyone — it’s about understanding the system: who pays, why, and who your agent is really working for.

Renting & Regulation · 13 July 2026

On the Costa Blanca it’s entirely normal: the agency charges the owner a commission and, on top, charges the tenant “honorarios”, “gastos de gestión” or “tramitación”. Is that allowed? The short answer: it depends on the contract type — and in that distinction hides a model that, in our view, has grown crooked along the coast. This article names no one: it explains the system, the law, and the signals that protect you — whether you’re an owner or a tenant.

The rule since the Housing Law: on main-home rentals, the owner pays

Since 26 May 2023, article 20.1 of the LAU is unambiguous: on rentals of a main home, agency and contract-drafting costs are borne by the landlord — private individual or company alike (for companies it had applied since 2019). Charging those amounts to the tenant is illegal under any label: Spain’s consumer authority also treats disguised versions as unfair practice — “solvency checks”, “file-opening fees” or compulsory “service packages”.

And it genuinely gets fined. In April 2026 the consumer authority confirmed a €3.6 million fine against a large national rental intermediary, among other things for compulsory tenant charges that were disguised fees. Such clauses are void, and amounts paid can be reclaimed.

So why do you still see double fees everywhere on the coast?

Because the ban lives in Title II of the LAU — the part on main-home rentals. Seasonal letting is “uso distinto de vivienda” (art. 3.2) and is governed by whatever the parties agree: there, charging tenant fees remains legal. On a coast where half the market is winter and mid-term stays, that space is real and legitimate. It starts to grate when a contract is called “temporada” purely to collect from both sides — or to sidestep tenant protection.

Judges look at reality, not the label: chained short contracts, no stated temporary reason, a tenant who is registered at the address and actually lives there — that gets reclassified as a main-home rental, and the fees charged to the tenant become undue and reclaimable. The Albacete provincial court confirmed it again in 2025.

Legal

Genuine seasonal lets (a real, stated temporary reason: wintering, work, study): tenant fees allowed, provided they are agreed transparently and in writing up front. Statutory deposit: two months.

Illegal

Main-home rentals: any charge to the tenant for agency work, contract drafting, “files” or compulsory “services” — under any name. Void, finable and reclaimable since 26-05-2023.

The uncomfortable question: who does your agent work for?

Earning from both sides isn’t legally banned on seasonal lets — but it creates an obvious conflict of interest: whoever collects from both sides profits from a fast signature, not necessarily a good one. Courts have been drawing lines for years: only the party who actually gave the mandate owes a fee, and opaque clauses get struck down. For the owner, the practical risk is subtle: less rigorous tenant screening, a sloppily handled deposit, a template contract — because the incentive is to close, not to protect.

The question isn’t whether your agent charges a commission. It’s who they work for when things get difficult.

How to recognise a trustworthy agent on the Costa Blanca

How we do it at Pulse Property

Our model is deliberately simple: whoever gives us the mandate is who pays us — the owner, on terms agreed in writing before we start. We work with the right contract for each situation (long-term, or seasonal with a real, documented reason), a deposit lodged where it should be, and tenants screened before anyone signs. Not because everything else is always illegal — but because we believe an intermediary can only truly protect one side, and we choose yours.

Want to know exactly what you’d pay — and what you wouldn’t — before you start?

Request a free, no-obligation yield review. You’ll get our fee model in writing, before you decide anything.

Our services Free yield review

This article is informational and does not constitute legal advice. Rules change and every case is different; have your specific situation reviewed by a qualified lawyer. Status as of: 13 July 2026.